Skip to main content

Xoomplus

llm SEO

Ranking in LLMs: How AI Decides What Information Matters

For many years, Google has been ranking your content. Now it’s time for AI to decide which content gets seen. But what makes an LLM choose one source over another? 

 

A group of researchers from Princeton and IIT Delhi tested 9 different ways to make content more visible in AI-generated answers. Two points clearly stood out from the rest. Adding statistics and adding quotes from credible sources created the biggest jump. It showed 40% more visibility compared to content which is not optimised. That finding from the paper that coined the term Generative Engine Optimisation is a good starting point for a question a lot of marketers are still confused about. How does an LLM actually decide what to rank, and what does that mean for LLM SEO in practice?

 

This guide will discuss how it gets decided and how we can optimise content for LLMs.

Today’s search is just like magic. It has changed a lot. People now ask AI tools for quick answers. Search is not just Google and blue links now. They do not even click a site first most of the time.

 

Key Takeaways

  • LLM SEO is the practice of shaping content so AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity are more likely to cite it in their answers
  • LLMs do not rank pages the way Google does. They retrieve sources, then generate an answer built from those sources
  • Statistics, quotes and clear structure consistently produce the strongest citation lift across independent studies
  • A real case study shows a fintech brand climb to the 5th most visible position in its category through this approach
  • Optimising content for LLMs means writing content that is easy to extract, not just easy to find

 

What Is LLM SEO?

Like mainstream SEO, LLM SEO focuses on creating content that has a better chance of being found and used by AI systems when they generate an answer. That could mean a direct citation with a link or simply being the source an AI pulls a fact from without naming it.

Rand Fishkin, founder of Moz and cofounder of SparkToro, has published research that complicates the whole idea of chasing a fixed set of ranking rules. His data found that AI systems are highly inconsistent when recommending brands or products, sometimes producing a different answer to the exact same question depending on how it is phrased. 

That does not make LLM SEO pointless. It means the goal is building real authority around a topic. 

How LLMs Decide What Matters?

Traditional search engines rank pages using signals such as backlinks, keywords, page speed and hundreds of other factors before returning a list of results. AI search works differently. While each AI system uses its own retrieval, ranking, grounding and generation processes, a simplified way to understand how AI selects information is to think of it in three stages: retrieval, source authority, and structure and extraction.

Stage 1: Retrieval 

When a visitor searches a question on ChatGPT or Perplexity, the model does not scan the web in real time and rank ten results. It pulls a set of candidate sources first. This is the retrieval step. It then writes an answer using those sources. Some models lean heavily on training data. Others, such as Perplexity, search the live web for nearly every query. Get excluded at the retrieval stage and nothing you write later will matter because the model never sees your page in the first place.

Stage 2: Source Authority

After the sources are retrieved, the model favours ones that agree with each other. A claim repeated across several independent, credible sources reads as more trustworthy than an unsupported assertion, even if it is a well-written one. This is part of why brand mentions on third-party sites carry real weight. A model forming an opinion about your brand is not merely reading your own website. It is checking what everyone else has already said.

Stage 3: Structure 

The last piece is extraction. Can the model extract a clean, self-contained answer out of a passage without needing the surrounding context to make sense? Ahrefs and Semrush have found that AI Overviews extract data from the top 20 organic results for a query. Content that answers a question directly in a tight and quotable passage gets lifted out far more often than a long and meandering paragraph that buries the point three sentences in.

How to Optimise for LLMs?

There is no fixed algorithm you can reverse engineer with certainty.  Instead, we have to look at patterns from many different studies and tests which often point to similar results. Here is what you can do: 

 1. Add Statistics and Quotes 

This was one of the strongest findings from the original GEO research. A vague claim gives an LLM very little to work with. A specific figure, that too when it is clearly attributed to a reliable source, gives it something much easier to use in an answer. If a page says a strategy improved results with a clear margin, that line is far less useful to a model than one that names an actual figure and where it came from.

2. Structure Content for Extraction

Break your content into clear and self-contained sections so that it can be extracted properly. Also use headings that state the actual question being answered. Keep separate passages readable on their own, as an LLM often lifts one paragraph without the rest of the page around it. Bullet points, short definitions and direct answers near the top of a section all help here.

3. Create Topical Authority Across a Subject

One strong article rarely earns lasting citations. A Semrush study of 50,000 brands across ChatGPT found out that visibility belongs to whichever brand covers a topic thoroughly. It is not for the page which ranks highest. Comparison content, alternatives, common questions and use cases, covered properly, creates the kind of coverage models actually reward.

 

Did You Know?

Roughly 80% of pages cited by AI tools do not appear anywhere in Google’s top 100 organic results for the same query, according to Ahrefs. LLMs are frequently pulling from an entirely different pool of sources than classic search ever did.

 

4. Earn Mentions on Third-Party Sites 

Your own website is only part of the picture. Reviews, forum discussions, industry publications and expert commentary all feed into how a model describes your brand. Yext’s research puts it plainly. The majority of citations in AI-generated answers trace back to brand-controlled or brand-adjacent sources. This means your presence across the wider web matters just as much as your own site.

 

Pro Tip

Before publishing, read your own content as if you were an AI model trying to pull one clean answer from it. If you cannot find a single self-contained sentence that fully answers the heading above it, rewrite that section.

 

Case Study: How Ramp Became One of the Most Visible Fintech Brands in AI Search

Fintech company Ramp used Profound’s Answer Engine Insights platform to see which content was actually being cited across AI search and which was being ignored entirely.

The shift was deliberate. Rather than continuing to publish generic marketing content, Ramp moved budget toward original research reports built around quotable statistics, the same combination the Princeton research had already flagged as the strongest citation driver.

As Gabriel Bertolo, creative director at Radiant Elephant, put it, the goal was making Ramp the primary source AI models cite when answering questions in its industry.

During a time span of weeks, Ramp became the 5th most visible fintech brand across AI search platforms.

This lines up with the retrieval and extraction mechanics discussed earlier in this guide. Ramp did not chase technical tricks. It produced content built around the two factors with the strongest measured evidence behind them. These are specific data and real authority on its subject.

Conclusion

SEO isn’t a mystery anymore once you separate the evidence from the guesswork. An LLM needs to find the right sources first. It then has to work out which information is useful and reliable before using parts of those sources in its response.

Content that names real numbers, structures its point clearly and earns mentions beyond its own website wins. Across several studies, clear, well-sourced and relevant content has shown potential to improve visibility in AI-generated answers, although results vary by platform, query and methodology.

If you want help making a content strategy around what really moves AI visibility, our team at XoomPlus can help.

 

Not sure whether your content is built for how LLMs actually work?

Get in touch with XoomPlus today and let us show you exactly where your current content is being seen and where it is being skipped entirely.

 

FAQs

What is LLM SEO?

LLM SEO is the practice of writing and structuring content so large language models like ChatGPT and Gemini are more likely to cite or reference it when generating an answer.

 

Focus on adding specific statistics and credible quotes, structuring content around direct answers, and building coverage across a full topic rather than a single page.

 

Traditional SEO ranks pages in a list based on signals like backlinks and keywords. LLM SEO involves being retrieved as a source, then having a specific passage extracted and cited within a generated answer.

 

Ranking well on Google helps, but it does not guarantee citation. Roughly 80% of AI-cited pages do not appear in Google’s top 100 results, so content built specifically for extraction and clarity often performs better than content built purely for classic rankings.

 

Yes. The original Princeton and IIT Delhi study found that adding statistics and quotes from credible sources produced the largest measured citation lift among nine tested methods.

 

Evidence for this is weak. Independent analysis has found little correlation between llms.txt adoption and actual citation rates, while genuinely well-structured, informative content shows a far stronger and more consistent link.